programs

judicial training

publications

press

reading room

about us

support us

contact us

job openings

 

RECENT STUDIES

 

Research Note: Same-sex Marriages in California
October 2008

We surveyed California counties in order estimate the number of same-sex couples who have married in the state in the first three months since these marriages were made legal in June, 2008.   This estimate provides a context for the potential impact of the upcoming California voter initiative, Proposition 8, which would change California’s Constitution to “eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry.”   We estimate that more than 11,000 same-sex couples have married in California between June 17 and September 17, 2008. 

 

Census Snapshot: California Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Population

By Gary J. Gates and Christopher Ramos
October 2008

 

This report provides demographic and economic information for the almost 861,000 LGB individuals and 109,000 same-sex couples living in California. We use the 2005/2006 American Community Survey (ACS), conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, to compare characteristics of same-sex couples to their different-sex married counterparts. We use data from the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Survey to consider demographic traits of the full lesbian, gay, and bisexual population in the state. The study shows nearly 25% of same-sex couples in California are raising more than 52,000 children. The study also shows that same-sex couples raising children have fewer economic resources than their heterosexual, married counterparts.


Gay and Lesbian Partnership: Evidence from California

By Christopher Carpenter and Gary J. Gates
October 2008

 

Much recent research on sexual minorities has used couples-based samples, which—by construction—provide no information on nonpartnered individuals. We present the first systematic empirical analysis of partnership and cohabitation among self-identified gay men and lesbians using two independent, large, population-based data sources from California. These data indicate that 37%–46% of gay men and 51%–62% of lesbians aged 18–59 are in cohabiting partnerships (compared with 62% of heterosexual individuals in coresidential unions at comparable ages). Unlike previous research, we find that white and highly educated gay men and lesbians are more likely to be partnered, and we confirm that same-sex cohabiting partners in our data have demographic characteristics that are similar to California same-sex couples from Census 2000. We also present the first detailed analysis of officially registered domestic partnerships in California. We find that almost half of partnered lesbians are officially registered with the local or state government, while less than a quarter of partnered gay men are officially registered. We conclude with implications of our findings for couples-based research on gay men and lesbians, as well as recommendations for survey data collection.



Registered Domestic Partnerships Among Gay Men and Lesbians: The Role of Economic Factors

M. V. Lee Badgett, Gary J. Gates, and Natalya C. Maisel

October 2008

 

In this paper, we predict the demand for a marriage-like status—registered domestic partnership–among same-sex couples. Domestic partnership in the state of California now comes with almost all of the rights and responsibilities of marriage that a state can provide. We use the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) Tobacco Use Survey conducted by the California Department of Health and the Field Research Corporation in 2003. From this telephone survey, we use a probability sample of 1,002 lesbian and gay individuals in California. Using multinomial probit models of partnership status (single, not cohabiting, cohabiting, or registered), we find limited evidence of economic motivations in the choice to register. Gay men’s likelihood of registration rises with income; lesbians’ probability of registration rises with age. Couples with longer duration are more likely to register, suggesting that registration and duration are complementary signals of commitment and possibly of the need for rights and benefits of registration.


The Fiscal Impact of Extending Federal Benefits to same-sex Domestic Partners

By Naomi G. Goldberg, Christopher Ramos, and M.V. Lee Badgett
September 2008

 

This report finds that offering health and other benefits to the same-sex partners of federal employees would add $41 million to the federal budget in the first year of coverage. Over ten years the report predicts the budgetary cost will be $675 million, a small percentage of the federal budget. The report also takes into account the added federal income taxes that will be paid by federal employees if they sign a partner up for health insurance. It estimates the cost of including partners in retirement benefits, work injury and death compensation, and travel and relocation expenses. Many benefits offered to federal employees, such as life insurance and family and medical leave, can be offered to domestic partners at no additional cost to the federal government.

 


 

Marriage, Registration and Dissolution by Same-sex Couples in the U.S.

By Gary J. Gates, M.V. Lee Badgett, and Deborah Ho

July 2008

This study analyzes data from states that have extended legal recognition to same-sex couples. Analyses show that same-sex couples want and use these new legal statuses. Furthermore, they react more enthusiastically when marriage is possible. More than 40% of same-sex couples have formed legal unions in states where such recognition is available. Same-sex couples prefer marriage over civil unions or domestic partnerships. In the first year that marriage was offered in Massachusetts, 37% of same-sex couples there married. In states that offered civil unions, only 12% of same-sex couples took advantage of this status in the first year and only 10% did so in states with domestic partnership registries.

 


 

The Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples on the California Budget
By Brad Sears and M.V. Lee Badgett
June 2008

This analysis estimates the impact of allowing same-sex couples to marry on California's state budget. Using the best data available, we estimate that over the next three years, the direct spending from same-sex couples on weddings and tourism will boost the state economy by over $683.6 million. This spending will create and sustain over 2,178 new jobs in California and generate $63.8 million for State and local government revenues.

 

Census Snapshots
This series of studies written by various Williams Institute researchers provides state-level demographic and economic information about same-sex couples and same-sex couples raising children across the country. 

Eventually, the series will include all 50 states, Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico. Please click on one of the following states to read the full report:
Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, New York City, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Puerto Rico.

The United States.




 


 

UPCOMING EVENTS


Recent Scholarship on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy
Los Angeles Queer Studies Conference
Friday, October 10
UCLA, Royce Hall, 4:00-5:30pm

Election 2008: A New Administration,
the LGBT Vote, and Proposition 8

Thursday, November 13
UCLA School of Law
Co-sponsored by The Center for
American Progress
For more information or to RSVP, click
here.
 

Click here to view the Fall 2008 Calendar.
__________

WORKS-IN-PROGRESS SERIES

Gender Identity Rights
David B. Cruz, Professor, USC School of Law
Wednesday, October 29

The Sexual Orientation Gap in
Labor Force Participation Rates:
The Role of Children

Michael Steinberger, Public Policy Fellow,
The Williams Institute
Wednesday, November 5

Living Under the Rainbow: New Research on Queer Family Lives

Charlotte Patterson, Professor of Psychology, University of Virginia

Friday, November 7

__________

Call for Papers

8th Annual Update - The Global Arc of Justice: Sexual Orientation Law Around the World,
March 11-14, 2009

__________


THE WILLIAMS INSTITUTE
IN THE NEWS


The Economist cites Senior Research Fellow Gary J. Gates' analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data

__________

CURRENT JOB OPENINGS