Census Must Count Gay Marriages When Bureau Changes Responses, It Denies Reality And Skews Data
Courant.com
By GARY J. GATES
July 23, 2008
When same-sex couples wed in California and Massachusetts, they do so
believing that their marriage licenses mean that their relationships finally
count in the eyes of the state. Unfortunately, they won't count in the eyes of
the U.S. Census Bureau.
According to its mission statement, the Census Bureau "serves as the leading
source of quality data about the nation's people." Well, not all of the people,
it turns out. Census Bureau procedures essentially hide legally married lesbian
and gay couples by altering their truthful responses about their relationship.
The Census Bureau argues that the federal Defense of Marriage Act — which
defines marriage as solely between a man and a woman for all purposes related to
federal regulations — prohibits it from recognizing same-sex marriages.
For the 2010 survey, the bureau intends to maintain the policy established in
2000, whereby it will edit the responses of married same-sex couples. Same-sex
spouses will be reported as "unmarried partners" in all census tabulations.
In 2000, before same-sex couples could legally marry anywhere in the United
States, the argument could be made that the bureau was changing responses to
something more accurate.
In fact, that change was viewed by many at the time as an improvement. In
1990, the bureau edited the sex of any same-sex spouses, thereby transforming
the same-sex couple into a different-sex married couple. Rather than completely
editing them out of the data, the 2000 census included them in counts of
same-sex "unmarried partners."
Although that decision might have been the right one then, conditions have
changed.
Today, same-sex couples can marry in California and Massachusetts, and these
marriages are recognized in New York. That means more than one in five Americans
lives in a state that recognizes the marriages of same-sex couples. Yet none of
these legally recognized couples will show up in publicly released census
tabulations. They will all be relegated to an unmarried status.
The Census Bureau has a well-deserved reputation for producing "gold
standard" data of uniformly high quality — and its accuracy is relied on by
journalists, researchers and the government itself.
Since 2000, more than 400 newspaper stories and scholarly journal articles
have referenced the census counts of same-sex couples. Government agencies such
as the Congressional Budget Office used census data to estimate the effect on
the federal budget if same-sex couples were permitted to marry.
Bureau officials should acknowledge the reality that same-sex couples are
legally married in the United States — and fix their procedures for counting and
describing America's estimated 780,000 same-sex couples and their families.
They should certainly stop altering the accurate responses of same-sex
couples who describe themselves as married.
Decisions about data collection should not be driven by political and
value-laden judgments about marriage. They should be grounded in the demographic
and legal realities of this nation.
Regardless of how one feels about the recognition of gay men and lesbians,
all sides in these debates could benefit from accurate data. Taking steps to
improve data quality on same-sex couples would permit scholars, policy-makers
and the American public to form opinions based on facts instead of anecdotes and
stereotypes.
Gary J. Gates is a senior research fellow at the Williams Institute at the
UCLA School of Law and coauthor of "The Gay and Lesbian Atlas." This first
appeared in the Los Angeles Times.