Books
Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence, Vol. 21-30A
(with Charles Alan Wright).
West Publishing (1978-2000).
Evidence.
2nd ed.
Casenotes (1996).
Prior edition: 1st, 1989.
Understanding Law School.
Casenotes (1990).
Articles and Chapters
Diligent Dave-A Remembrance, 43
Diligent Dave-A Remembrance
735
(2010).
Confrontation Stories: Raleigh on the Mayflower, 3
Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law
209-21
(2005).
Response, 55
University of Miami Law Review
1101-17
(2001).
Symposium: Evidence of Innocence Offered by the Criminal Defendant: “Not So Fast.”
What's the Matter with Evidence?, 25
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
773-81
(1992).
Symposium: Does Evidence Law Matter?
State Adaptation of the Federal Rules: The Pros and Cons, 43
Oklahoma Law Review
293-314
(1990).
UCLA Law School's Faltering Commitment to the Latino Community: The New Admissions Process (with Cesar Chavez et al.),
9
Chicano Law Review
73-96
(1988).
Review Essay: "There'll Always Be England": The Instrumental Ideology of Evidence, 85
Michigan Law Review
1204-1234
(1987).
A Primer on Proof of “Other Crimes,”, 10
CACJ Forum
19-23
(1983).
Review Essay: The Persistence of Progressive Proceduralism, 61
Texas Law Review
929-48
(1983).
Reviewing
Discovery: A Comparison Between English and American Civil Discovery Law with Reform Proposals, by Julius B. Levine.
The Politics of Federal Rulemaking: The Tangled History of Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 7
CACJ Forum
27-30
(1980).
The Right of Confrontation and the Hearsay Rule: Sir Walter Raleigh Loses Another One, 8
Criminal Law Bulletin
99-144
(1972).
The Preliminary Hearing in Los Angeles: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, Part 1 (with Leon Letwin),
18
UCLA Law Review
636-757
(1971).
Part 2, 18
UCLA Law Review 916-61 (1971).
The Right of Confrontation and Rules of Evidence: Sir Walter Raleigh Rides Again, 9
Alaska Law Journal
3-31
(1971).
The Right of Confrontation and Rules of Evidence: The Return of the Portuguese Gentleman, 9
Alaska Law Journal
3-17
(1971).
What is "Custodial Interrogation"?: California's Anticipatory Application of Miranda v. Arizona, 14
UCLA Law Review
59-134
(1966).