Are Democrats
ignoring gays? Candidates must incorporate gay rights
The GW Hatchett
By Sophie Zavaglia
March 6, 2008It seems like no matter where I go or what
I do, I keep hearing the same old campaign slogans -
Barack Obama's "Yes, we can!" and Hillary Clinton's recent
"Make History!" Both Clinton and Obama are certainly right
- history is being made in this country. As candidates,
both Obama and Clinton represent hundreds, if not
thousands, of years of fighting for total equality. We
currently have two candidates who stand for social change
and the fight for equality… right?
Being a Democrat, I was initially overjoyed with both
these candidates when they declared their intentions to
run for president, because I felt confident that either
candidate's presidency would bring about crucial changes
on significant political issues.
But after all the speeches I've heard them give, I
found Obama and Clinton relatively quiet on the issue of
gay rights. This was especially surprising considering
their penchant for public speaking. I couldn't accept that
these candidates who based their entire campaigns on the
idea of equality and social justice had said relatively
little about the need for equality for homosexuals.
Just to be fair, I dove right into the candidates'
platforms, looking for their stance on the issue of gay
rights.
Clinton's Web site touts her status as a "Champion for
Women" and her push for universal health care. But, it
fails to acknowledge gay rights in any way.
Obama's Web site yielded the same result. As I browsed
through Obama's "Issues," I found sections on "Civil
Rights," "Education" and "Economy," but not a word on the
rights of homosexuals. I thought that maybe I could find
Obama's defense on gay rights under a section curiously
titled "Additional Issues." It seems that Mr. Obama has
something to say about art and sportsmen, but not about
ensuring the rights of homosexuals.
Conversely, both Obama and Hillary have recently made
statements assuring gay, lesbian and bisexual voters that
they are supporters of the fight to ensure equal rights
for the LGBT community. Notably, Obama dedicated an open
letter to the LGBT community assuring them of his fight
for "equality for all." Interestingly enough, according to
a recent study by The Williams Institute, both Texas and
Ohio are on the list of the top ten states that have the
largest gay, lesbian and bisexual populations, ranking
fourth and sixth respectively. Is it a coincidence that
this letter came out shortly before Tuesday's primary? I
think not. The sad truth is that Obama and Cliton aren't
"reaching out" to the LGBT community - they are pandering
to it.
Despite all their rhetoric about breaking the mold of
"politics-as-usual" and challenging the status quo, both
Obama and Clinton have fallen back into typical political
behavior by addressing the issue of gay rights in such a
glib manner. To be clear, I'm not saying they are against
gay rights. One need only look at their records to
highlight that they have voted in a fairly consistent way
in support of the gay community.
However, in this election, they both remained
remarkably quiet on the issue of gay rights until it was
politically advantageous for them to speak out. Both Obama
and Clinton are treating the "gay vote" as a momentary
prize to be won. Instead, they should be making gay rights
a permanent issue, voicing support for the fight for gay
rights even when it is not popular. In ignoring this
critical issue until recently, both candidates are denying
the significance of this issue in the same way that equal
rights have been historically denied to both blacks and
women. Spouting off that we "can" change society
accomplishes nothing. Senators Clinton and Obama must
openly address gay rights at all times if they value true
equality and social justice, not just when it's going to
guarantee them a vote.
The writer is a sophomore majoring in political
science.
|