The Cost of Gay Marriage – in Dollars and Cents
The Christian Science Monitor By Kathryn Perry
May 26, 2009
As states like California grapple over gay
marriage, New England has found that it can be a
small fillip to the economy.
Provincetown, Mass. - Maghi Geary might have some
peculiar advice for Californians: Gay marriage is
good for business. The co-owner of Provincetown
Florist has 20 to 30 weddings booked this summer,
and the reason for that decent return is evident in
the next customer who walks through the door – a
lesbian couple from Kansas desperately in need of
some carnations for their wedding.
Tuesday, the California Supreme Court made the
most recent in a series of legislative and judicial
decisions on gay marriage nationwide: It upheld
Proposition 8, a measure that bans gay marriage in
the state. But here in Massachusetts, gay marriage
has been legal since 2003, and in Provincetown, more
than 2,000 same-sex couples have tied the knot since
then.
In some ways, this farthest fingernail of Cape
Cod is emblematic of the economics of gay marriage:
a big impact, but only at the margins.
Massachusetts estimates that gay marriage has
added money to its coffers – but only about $37
million a year, or less than 1 percent of the annual
state budget.
In the private sector, the wedding industry could
grow by more than $16 billion if gay marriage were
expanded to all 50 states, according to a 2004 study
by Forbes magazine.
But Massachusetts' experience suggests that money
would be concentrated in cities with a significant
gay population, like Provincetown.
Yet critics say the talk of economic profit
obscures a greater social cost. "It's the societal
message that same-sex marriage sends – that children
do not need a mother and a father," says Kevin
Smith, executive director of New Hampshire's
Cornerstone Policy Research, which opposes gay
marriage.
"People on both sides of this issue want it to be
passed or banned because of their moral beliefs," he
says.
The economic aspects of gay marriage, however,
are becoming clearer – particularly in New England.
Of the five states that allow gay marriage, four are
in New England. New Hampshire, too, is considering a
bill to legalize it. Moreover, New England is home
to three of the top six states when ranked by
highest concentration of same-sex couples, according
to a 2007 study by the Williams Institute at the
University of California in Los Angeles.
For the state of Massachusetts, revenue from gay
marriage has come from three main sources: First,
marriage licenses.
Second, income taxes are generally higher for
married couples than they are for single filers,
because many married couples have two incomes, which
drives them into a higher tax bracket and incurs a
"marriage penalty." This is particularly true for
same-sex couples, who are more likely than
heterosexual couples to have two incomes.
Third, same-sex marriage decreases costs for
state benefit programs. Since marriage – whether gay
or heterosexual – provides a safety net for spouses,
an expansion of marriage results in more people
becoming ineligible for state benefits. A Maine
study, for instance, found that the state could save
as much as $7.3 million a year in benefits since it
legalized same-sex marriage.
Moreover, in Massachusetts, where gay marriage
has been legal the longest, spending on same-sex
weddings has brought the state $110 million so far,
the Williams Institute study concludes.
"It's a lot of couples spending a lot of money,"
says M.V. Lee Badgett, research director at the
Williams Institute and an economics professor at the
University of Massachusetts in Amherst. "In towns
and cities with a high percentage of gay residents,
we can really see the impact."
Anecdotal evidence points to a significant
economic windfall in a handful of places:
Same-sex weddings account for about 90 percent of
business at It's About Time Events, a
wedding-planning business in Boston. "On average, my
clients spend about $30,000 on a 100-person
wedding," says Bernadette Smith, adding that she's
already planned between 80 and 90 same-sex weddings
in recent years.
In Moretown, Vt., Megan Schultz says of her
events company: "From a business standpoint, I have
definitely seen an increase in traffic" with the
legalization of same-sex marriages. "My specialty is
in offbeat weddings, which would most certainly
include same-sex weddings," she says. "The addition
of same-sex couples to my clientele can only be a
good thing."
Not everyone agrees. Critics suggest that
same-sex marriage would create new burdens for
companies by expanding the list of employees for
whom they would have to offer spousal benefits. But
research has indicated that "such coverage only adds
about 1 to 2 percent to companies' healthcare
costs," according to a 2004 online article for
Workforce Management.