Female Couples Taking the Lead in Same-Sex Marriage
Sacramento Bee
By Dorothy Korber and Bobby Caina Calvan
June 20, 2008
So far, lesbians account for 60% of same-sex licenses in county
The conventional view that women embrace commitment more eagerly than
men is playing out in the unconventional new world of same-sex matrimony,
judging from the growing stack of marriage licenses in Sacramento County.
Based on a tally of the licenses Thursday – using first names as a
guide – 60 percent of the same-sex newlyweds this week are lesbians and 40
percent are gay men. Among heterosexual couples – to no one's surprise –
the gender breakdown is 50-50.
For academics who study gay and lesbian lifestyles, the preponderance
of women marching up the aisle is also no surprise.
In states that offer some kind of legal recognition to same-sex
couples, lesbians in committed relationships outnumber gay men by a 2-1
margin, said Gary Gates, a demographer at the Williams Institute at UCLA's
School of Law.
Studies suggest that women pair up more often because they are more
likely to have children together. Men, who historically out-earn women,
are less likely to partner for economic protection.
"Women want to be married more than men do," said Gates. "The idea of
partnering is more attractive to women."
Yet some studies suggest that gay men are in relationships of longer
duration than lesbians, Gates said, noting that women initiate divorce at
a higher rate than men.
One clear pattern is that lesbian couples are more likely than gay men
to raise children – four times as likely, according to a national survey
conducted in 2005 by UC Davis psychologist Gregory Herek.
"I think that for many couples, one of the important factors in
formalizing their relationship is the presence of children, for the
protection that marriage provides," Herek said.
In Yolo County, lesbian newlyweds outnumbered men by an even greater
percentage than in Sacramento. Since Monday, the Yolo County clerk has
issued 26 same-sex marriage licenses, 17 of them – or 65 percent – to
lesbian couples.
Longtime Davis resident Ellen Pontac, who married her partner Monday
evening, has a theory to explain Yolo's popularity among female couples.
"When we moved to Davis, we still had three kids at home, and it just
was a great place to be a kid – it's a wonderful family town," Pontac
said.
In Sacramento County, about 170 couples took out marriage licenses on
Tuesday and Wednesday. Of those, at least 133 were gay or lesbian couples
– based on analysis of their first names. At least 26 were presumed to be
heterosexual couples.
For about a dozen of the licenses – with all due respect to Dusty and
Robye – it was anybody's guess which gender the couples were.
This guessing game is the result of the state Supreme Court's May 15
decision that made same-sex marriage legal, effective Monday. Under the
ruling, the California Department of Health, whose vital records office
maintains marriage forms, did away with all terms identifying gender.
Instead of "bride" and "groom," those tying the knot are now simply
referred to as "Party A" and "Party B."
"The data geek in me is absolutely frustrated that we can't actually
determine how many same-sex couples get married," said UCLA's Gates. "Yet
the other side of me totally gets it, that marriage is just marriage."
"No big deal," said Ward Connerly, the former University of California
regent who has no use for boxes that categorize people.
Connerly led a failed 2003 crusade for a "racial privacy" initiative to
strip racial identifiers from all government forms.
He has the same objection to the notion of collecting data on gender.
"I don't know why the government needs to gather that information,"
Connerly said.
He plans to vote against the November ballot measure that would amend
the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
"I don't think the government needs to know," he said. "I don't know
why the public needs to know. It's not their life, it's not their
business." |