Keep Gay Marriage for the Love of Money
The Daily Aztec
By Allan Acevedo
June 23, 2008We've all heard it: We're in a recession. Gas prices are
ridiculous, the cost of goods are rising, but for some people it's not all
bad news. After years of inequality, gay and lesbian couples can finally
apply for marriage licenses in California. This could mean a lot to our
troubled economy.
Last month, the California Supreme Court made a historic and
controversial decision by voting 4-3 in support for fairness, equality and
respect for all couples-gay or straight. The state would recognize "the
right of an individual to establish a legally recognized family with the
person of one's choice," Chief Justice Ronald George said. Public support
for marriage equality has grown substantially in recent years. Field poll
results from 1977 show a 28 percent approval of gay marriage, compared to
the 51 percent who support it today.
For many people who do not support marriage equality, one factor might
help change their minds. In a speech given in San Francisco, Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger stated that he hoped the newly attained rights of the
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community would lead to an economic
boom to California's troubled economy. A recent study issued by the
Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law at UCLA estimated that gay
and lesbian couples would spend close to $684 million in the next three
years on wedding expenditures such as cakes, photographers, invitations,
dresses, limo rentals, hotels and more.
Researchers estimate that more than half of California's 100,000
same-sex couples will exchange vows during the next three years. Unlike
Massachusetts, the only other state that issues same-sex marriage
licenses, there is no residency prerequisite in order to be issued a
license. That means out-of-state dollars will be flowing into the
California economy, which has in effect created a monopoly on same-sex
marriages, an ideal economic condition for the state. Added on to this,
New York has recently announced that it will recognize all out-of-state
marriage licenses, further encouraging couples to take the plunge.
It's estimated that 68,000 out-of-state couples will come to California
specifically to wed. The researchers state that same-sex weddings will
generate $64 million in tax revenues for the state, $9 million in
marriage-license fees from all the counties in the state and create and
sustain about 2,200 jobs. By some estimates, weddings and commitment
ceremonies for same-sex couples generate $1 billion a year in revenue.
PlanetOut, a media and entertainment company that conducts surveys, states
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender consumers earn 20 percent more than
their straight counterparts on average, and spend about 10 percent more on
nuptials.
These are no small numbers. Even conservatives who oppose marriage
equality should stop and consider these figures when heading to the polls
on November 4.
That's right, despite the Supreme Court's ruling, an initiative has
qualified for the November ballot that will ask voters whether the State
Constitution should be amended to explicitly state that marriage is
between a man and a woman.
If it were to pass, this amendment would trump the Supreme Court ruling
of May 15. The fear that this important and historic right will be taken
away is compelling many same-sex couples to marry as soon as possible.
This new found right may be short lived if enough Californians decide that
a more stable economy is not worth extending basic civil rights to the
LGBT community. Before you go to vote "yes" on the limits on marriage,
think twice.
Arguments focusing on fairness and equality might not tug on your
heartstrings, but this estimated economic boost might reach your purse
strings. Voting "no" on this unjust initiative will mean more than
improving an unstable economy, it will mean furthering our society in
allocating freedom to all facets of our civilization. Come November vote
"no" on limiting marriage equality. It seems like a win-win situation to
me.
-Allan Acevedo is a political science and ISCOR sophomore and a
staff columnist.
-This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Daily
Aztec. Send e-mail to letters@thedailyaztec.com. Anonymous letters will
not be printed - include your full name, major and year in school.
|