Faculty Profiles

Jennifer Mnookin

Jennifer L. Mnookin

Dean, David G. Price and Dallas P. Price Professor of Law, and Faculty Co-Director, PULSE @ UCLA Law (Program on Understanding Law, Science & Evidence)
A.B. Harvard, 1988
J.D. Yale, 1995
Ph.D. History and Social Study of Science and Technology, M.I.T., 1999
UCLA Faculty Since 2005


Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (with Jeremy Blumenthal, Ed Chang, David Faigman, Erin Murphy & Joseph Sanders). 2014-15 ed. West Publishing (2014).
The New Wigmore: Expert Evidence (with David Kaye & David E. Bernstein). 2nd ed. Aspen (2010). Supplemented Annually.

Articles, Essays and Chapters

Repeat-Play Evidence: Judge Jack Weinstein, ‘Pedagogical Devices,’ Technology and Evidence, 64 DePaul Law Review (forthcoming 2015). Clifford Symposium in honor of Jack Weinstein.
Constructing Evidence and Educating Juries: The Case for Modular, Made-In-Advance Expert Evidence about Eyewitness Identifications and False Confessions, 93 Texas Law Review 1811 (2015).
Forensic Comparison and Matching of Fingerprints: Using Quantitative Image Measures for Estimating Error Rates Through Understanding and Predicting Difficulty (with Phil Kellman, Genna Erlikhman, Itiel Dror, David Charlton & Tandra Ghose), PLOS One (May 2014).
Semi-Legibility and Visual Evidence: An Initial Exploration, 10 Law, Culture and the Humanities 43 (2014).
Confronting Science: Expert Evidence and the Confrontation Clause (with David H. Kaye), 2012 Supreme Court Review 99 (2013). Full Text
Atomism, Holism, and the Judicial Assessment of Evidence, 60 UCLA Law Review 1524 (2013). Full Text
Implicit Bias in the Courtroom (with Jerry Kang, Judge Mark Bennett, Devon Carbado, Pam Casey, Nilanjana Dasgupta, David Faigman, Rachel Godsil, Anthony G. Greenwald, & Justin Levinson), 59 UCLA Law Review 1124-86 (2012). Full Text
The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences (with Simon A. Cole, Itiel Dror, Barry A.J. Fisher, Max M. Houck, Keith Inman, David H. Kaye, Jonathan J. Koehler, Glenn Langenburg, Michael D. Risinger, Norah Rudin, Jay Siegel, and David A. Stoney), 58 UCLA Law Review 725 (2011). Full Text
The Courts, The National Academy of Science, and the Future of Forensic Science, 75 Brooklyn Law Review 1209 (2010). The Ira M. Belfer Lecture, 2009.
The Use of Technology in Human Expert Domains: Challenges and Risks Arising From the Use of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems in Forensics (with Itiel Dror), 9(1) Law, Probability & Risk 47-67 (2010). Full Text
Expert Evidence, Partisanship and Epistemic Competence, 73 Brooklyn Law Review 1009 (2008). Full Text
The Validity of Latent Fingerprint Identification: Confessions of a Fingerprinting Moderate, 7 Law, Probablity and Risk 127 (2008). Full Text
Of Black Boxes, Machines, and Experts: Problems in the Assessment of Legal and Scientific Validity, 5 Episteme (2008).
Experts and Forensic Evidence, 37 Southwestern University Law Review 1009 (2008). Revised transcript from Symposium.
Expert Evidence and the Confrontation Clase after Crawford v. Washington, 15 Journal of Law and Policy 791-862 (2007). Full Text
Idealizing Science and Demonizing Experts: An Intellectual History of Expert Evidence, 52 Villanova Law Review 763-801 (2007). Symposium issue. Full Text
Bifurcation and the Law of Evidence, 155 University of Pennsylvania Law Review Pennumbra 134-145 (2006).
People v. Castro: Challenging the Forensic Use of DNA Evidence, in Evidence Stories (edited by Richard Lempert, Foundation Press, 2006).
Uncertain Bargains: The Rise of Plea Bargains in America, 57 Stanford Law Review 1721 (2005). Reviewing Plea Bargaining's Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America, by George Fisher.
Reproducing a Trial: Evidence and Its Assessment in Paradise Lost, in Law on the Screen (edited by edited by Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Merrill Umphrey, Stanford University Press, 2005). Full Text
Expert Information and Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy (with Samuel R. Gross), 34 Seton Hall Law Review 141-189 (2003). Full Text
Scripting Expertise: The History of Handwriting Identification Evidence and the Judicial Construction of Expertise, 87 Virginia Law Review 1723-1845 (2001). Full Text
Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling, 67 Brooklyn Law Review 13 (Fall 2001).
Theaters of Proof Visual Evidence and the Law in Call Northside 777 (with Nancy West), 13 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 329 (2001). Full Text
Virtual(Ly) Law: The Emergence Of Law In An On-Line Community, in Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates, And Pirate Utopias (edited by Peter Ludlow, MIT Press, 2001). Revised and expanded from Virtual(Ly) Law: The Emergence of Law in LambdaMOO, 2 Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (June 1996). Also excerpted in Before The Law, College Level Law Textbook.
The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy, 10 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 1 (Winter 1998). Full Text

Short Writings

Regarding Champod (with Michael Risinger, William Thompson and others), 54 Science & Justice (2014).
Reflections on Law Teaching, 62 UCLA Law Review Discourse 126 (2014).
Time for DNA Disclosure (with D. E. Krane and 39 others), 326 Science 1631 (18 Dec. 2009).
Science at the Bar, 92 American Scientist 556 (July–Aug. 2004). Reviewing Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America, by Tal Golan.
Fingerprints: Not A Gold Standard, 20 Issues In Science & Technology 47 (Fall 2003).
Expert Testimony on Fingerprints: An Internet Exchange (with Richard Friedman, D.H. Kaye, Dale Nance And Michael Saks), 43 Jurimetrics 91-98 (Fall 2002).
Science And Law, in The Oxford Companion To American Law (2002).
Book Review, 41 Technology And Culture 828 (2000). Reviewing Of Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Philip E. Agre and Marc Rotenberg.
Book Review, 17 Law And History Review 174 (1999). Reviewing The Law Of Evidence In Victorian England, by Christopher J.W. Allen.

Amicus Briefs

Brief of Scientists and Scholars of Fingerprint Identification, Acosta v. Holder (9th Cir. 2012).  Contributed to drafting.  Conducted oral argument on behalf of Amici before 9th Circuit, Sept. 2012.
Law Professors' Brief, Bullcoming v. New Mexico (S.Ct., 2010-11 term). Primary authorship.
Law Professors' Brief, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (S.Ct. 2008-09 term). Primary authorship.
Commonwealth v. Patterson (SJC, Mass. 2005). Contributed to drafting.

Policy Reports

Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach.  The Report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. (Group leader for Interpretation chapter) (2012).


Can a Jury Believe What It Sees? Videotaped Confessions Can Be Misleading, New York Times (July 13, 2014).
The West Memphis Three and Combating Cognitive Biases, L.A. Times (Aug. 23, 2011).
Clueless ‘Science', L.A. Times (Feb. 19, 2009).
The Problem with Expanding DNA Searches, L.A. Times (April 5, 2007).
The Achilles’ Heel of Fingerprinting, Washington Post (May 29, 2004).
A Blow to the Credibility of Fingerprint Evidence, Boston Globe (Feb. 2, 2004).
Visual Evidence, Chicago Tribune (Jan. 23, 1997).